A former JPMorgan employee, Chirayu Rana, filed a lawsuit against executive Lorna Hajdini on April 27, 2026, in New York County, alleging sexual harassment. The case quickly unraveled amid accusations of fabrication and a lack of supporting evidence.
The initial claims emerged after Rana attempted to negotiate a payoff in the millions before filing the lawsuit. He accused Hajdini of drugging him and coercing him into sexual acts. However, it was revealed that they were colleagues reporting to different managing directors, which raises questions about the validity of his allegations.
Shortly after filing under the pseudonym John Doe, Rana withdrew the lawsuit for corrections. This development occurred just as JPMorgan conducted an internal investigation that found no evidence to support his claims. A spokesperson for the bank stated, “Following an investigation, we don’t believe there’s any merit to these claims.”
Hajdini’s attorneys firmly denied all allegations against her: “Lorna categorically denies the allegations. She never engaged in any inappropriate conduct with this individual of any kind and has never even been to the location where the alleged sexual assault supposedly took place.” These statements indicate a strong defense from Hajdini’s legal team.
Rana’s age—35—compared to Hajdini’s 37 years adds another layer to this complex narrative. While Rana is now a principal at Bregal Sagemount, his motivations for pursuing such serious allegations are under scrutiny.
The lawsuit also includes claims of retaliation by JPMorgan for failing to investigate properly. Yet, without substantial evidence backing these assertions, the case may struggle to gain traction in court.
No trial date has been set at this juncture, leaving many unanswered questions about how this situation will unfold. Officials have not clarified if or when Rana might refile his claims after making corrections.
This unfolding drama highlights significant issues surrounding workplace conduct and corporate accountability—especially within powerful institutions like JPMorgan Chase. The ramifications extend beyond just those directly involved; they may influence how future allegations are handled within corporate environments.
